Monday, October 27, 2008
Exercise #4
Because I have unexpectedly changed my topic based on new information (for a better understanding of the assignment) received from the instructor, I am unable to do this exercise, but please allow me as an individual, student, and entity the "Full Faith and Credit Clause", as I always put fourth extra effort in other assignments to make up for what assignments (such as this one) I was unable to complete on time.
Women's Priorities At Work...
I was unable to upload the graph because it is an Adobe "Flash" graph.
The graph states that women consider good "benefits" the ultimate contributing factor to job satisfaction. By the way, I find this to be very interesting, considering I am of the opposite sex.
Below are the claims made by the graph (women surveyed):
Claim 1) Good benefits - 84% of women surveyed said this was the "ultimate" factor
Claim 2) Fair compensation - 81% of women surveyed
Claim 3) High trust level between managers and workers - 81%
Claim 4) Company that rewards excellence - 77%
Claim 5) Open communications - 75%
The graph states that women consider good "benefits" the ultimate contributing factor to job satisfaction. By the way, I find this to be very interesting, considering I am of the opposite sex.
Below are the claims made by the graph (women surveyed):
Claim 1) Good benefits - 84% of women surveyed said this was the "ultimate" factor
Claim 2) Fair compensation - 81% of women surveyed
Claim 3) High trust level between managers and workers - 81%
Claim 4) Company that rewards excellence - 77%
Claim 5) Open communications - 75%
Monday, October 20, 2008
OVRC
I found the OVRC to be very helpful and understanding, as I quickly took upon what help it had to offer on finding a useful topic. I am not going to disclose my topic as of yet, but my paper will be of my best quality, as I am steadily working on it everyday (I am trying to prioritize and complete my work substantially ahead of time). I must say that I am completely settled on my topic, particularly without the help of the OVRC, but as I said, I did take in some pointers from the OVRC in making my absolute decision to the tenth extent, or should I say for the tenth time this week. With that said, I truly was not surprised by anything, but more so enlightened. I hope it the OVRC was helpful for others also. I can't wait to submit my argument of fact!
Worth The Argument?
"Hurricanes are increasing in number and ferocity."
I will definitely say that this is a true statement (topic) that brings resonance to a thoughtful argument. You can argue that statement, but only lightly as the facts (consistently released every year by NOAA) provide substantial basis for the factual statement.
"Many people die annually of cancer."
This statement (topic) is true, but the word "many" can be argued as it is not definitive in is value (number). Although, it is a fact that "many", as in great numbers of people (individuals) do die annually of cancer, and this rate of death is steadily increasing not just here in the United States, but globally.
"Fewer people would die of heart disease each year if more of them paid attention to their diets."
I must say that this is "not" worth arguing, not because it is "true", but because the scope of the topic dramatically extends farther then the mentioned reasoning of watching a persons diet. Need I say genetics and lifestyle...?
"Japan might have come to terms more readily in 1945 if the Allies hadn't demanded unconditional surrender."
This is a somewhat "controversial" topic, mainly because the culture of the Japanese needs to be examined before ever making a statement such that above. If you argue this topic, you are arguing history, which can't be changed, only debated as to its other possibilities. Basically, am I Japanese? Did I live in Japan during WWII? Do I understand the Japanese culture enough to have an argument? No, no, and no.
"Boys would do better in school if there were more men teaching in the elementary and secondary classrooms."
This topic can be argued, but I am sure you will get "mixed" responses to such a topic, as this statement seems very opinionated, and not at all factual, or proven extensively by studies.
"The ever-increasing number of minorities in higher education is evidence that racial problems have just about ended in the United States."
As myself being a minority, I must say that I would definitely have "plenty" to say about this topic in a college audience. This is a completely opinionated statement with no factual basis or support. In fact, there is truly an increasing number of minorities in penitentiaries, more then those engaging in higher education, yet this topic by itself can bring "deep" thoughts on even a broader scope. It will bring an argument, I can assure you. Next!
"There aren't enough high-paying jobs for college graduates these days."
The fact of the matter is that most college graduates have to compete to get the high-paying jobs, and they must also have the academic success to lead the way. You determine that, and let it be known that this topic is very opinionated also. I would not even bother to argue such a statement (topic).
"Hydrogen may never be a viable alternative to fossil fuels because it takes too much energy to change hydrogen into a usable form."
The term "may" and "never" seem to bring light to an argument because technology advances and you can go to the state of Utah to see hydrogen cars in action. In fact, it is a dramatically cheaper alternative over gasoline, and the technology is being advanced upon every year for even more efficiency. Go read a "Popular Science" magazine and learn something...
"Only one of the first forty-three presidents of the United States was a Catholic."
This statement (topic) has little, but some basis for an argument, but the facts are clear and direct regarding any debate that might come about. You cannot dispute history, or can you? It's like taking text out of a history book and saying it's wrong...
"Political activists have grossly exaggerated the effects of the USA Patriot Act on free expression."
I personally would argue this to my last hour. This statement (topic) is very negatively and incorrectly referenced, and you do not need the ACLU to tell you. Let easily say that the Patriot Act has yet to be fully "interpreted" as to what it allows "Uncle Sam" to do and not do. The U.S. Supreme Court has plenty of years to define the Patriot Act, but until then, do not expect to have privacy or free expression in America. That's my two cents.
I will definitely say that this is a true statement (topic) that brings resonance to a thoughtful argument. You can argue that statement, but only lightly as the facts (consistently released every year by NOAA) provide substantial basis for the factual statement.
"Many people die annually of cancer."
This statement (topic) is true, but the word "many" can be argued as it is not definitive in is value (number). Although, it is a fact that "many", as in great numbers of people (individuals) do die annually of cancer, and this rate of death is steadily increasing not just here in the United States, but globally.
"Fewer people would die of heart disease each year if more of them paid attention to their diets."
I must say that this is "not" worth arguing, not because it is "true", but because the scope of the topic dramatically extends farther then the mentioned reasoning of watching a persons diet. Need I say genetics and lifestyle...?
"Japan might have come to terms more readily in 1945 if the Allies hadn't demanded unconditional surrender."
This is a somewhat "controversial" topic, mainly because the culture of the Japanese needs to be examined before ever making a statement such that above. If you argue this topic, you are arguing history, which can't be changed, only debated as to its other possibilities. Basically, am I Japanese? Did I live in Japan during WWII? Do I understand the Japanese culture enough to have an argument? No, no, and no.
"Boys would do better in school if there were more men teaching in the elementary and secondary classrooms."
This topic can be argued, but I am sure you will get "mixed" responses to such a topic, as this statement seems very opinionated, and not at all factual, or proven extensively by studies.
"The ever-increasing number of minorities in higher education is evidence that racial problems have just about ended in the United States."
As myself being a minority, I must say that I would definitely have "plenty" to say about this topic in a college audience. This is a completely opinionated statement with no factual basis or support. In fact, there is truly an increasing number of minorities in penitentiaries, more then those engaging in higher education, yet this topic by itself can bring "deep" thoughts on even a broader scope. It will bring an argument, I can assure you. Next!
"There aren't enough high-paying jobs for college graduates these days."
The fact of the matter is that most college graduates have to compete to get the high-paying jobs, and they must also have the academic success to lead the way. You determine that, and let it be known that this topic is very opinionated also. I would not even bother to argue such a statement (topic).
"Hydrogen may never be a viable alternative to fossil fuels because it takes too much energy to change hydrogen into a usable form."
The term "may" and "never" seem to bring light to an argument because technology advances and you can go to the state of Utah to see hydrogen cars in action. In fact, it is a dramatically cheaper alternative over gasoline, and the technology is being advanced upon every year for even more efficiency. Go read a "Popular Science" magazine and learn something...
"Only one of the first forty-three presidents of the United States was a Catholic."
This statement (topic) has little, but some basis for an argument, but the facts are clear and direct regarding any debate that might come about. You cannot dispute history, or can you? It's like taking text out of a history book and saying it's wrong...
"Political activists have grossly exaggerated the effects of the USA Patriot Act on free expression."
I personally would argue this to my last hour. This statement (topic) is very negatively and incorrectly referenced, and you do not need the ACLU to tell you. Let easily say that the Patriot Act has yet to be fully "interpreted" as to what it allows "Uncle Sam" to do and not do. The U.S. Supreme Court has plenty of years to define the Patriot Act, but until then, do not expect to have privacy or free expression in America. That's my two cents.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Iraq War
My thoughts on the Iraq War before I took this class were somewhat direct in opposition of it entirely. I supported the invasion into Afghanistan, yet I was outright against committing our troops into Iraq. As of today, the U.S. has committed over five hundred billion dollars into a war that was financed by treasury bonds (loans), that tax payers have to pay the interest on before even coughing up the principal. Some of our troops have done multiple tours in Iraq, yet they still do not know what they will be able to come back home permanently. If you read my last three sentences, I think you can somewhat understand my feelings on the situation.
Has my opinion changed since this class began? No, nor will they ever. Bring our troops home, and quit printing money that we do not even have to spend!
Has my opinion changed since this class began? No, nor will they ever. Bring our troops home, and quit printing money that we do not even have to spend!
Monday, October 6, 2008
Patriotism
Many people have confused patriotism with nationalism, which could not be further from its true and rightful definition. In order to be patriotic, we must do the right things because they are the right things to do. It is not enough that we be a strong country, as we must also use that strength for the purpose of good. That is my definition of patriotism. What is yours?
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Spears Essay
After reading the "Why I Hate Britney" essay by a University of Texas student, I must honestly say that I was considerably impressed. I would easily give the essay a B, not just because of its topic etc., but also because of the effort.
The writer sufficiently developed a topic with clear argument, so I must say that the content was considerably direct. The essay was organized with moderate sequence and it kept its point of view in "almost" every consecutive paragraph. In fact, call the organization of the essay an "almost" true attempt of flowing procession, but not quite perfect.
The style of the essay had a very serious tone and was partially to the point, based on the factual evidence, such as direct quotes given that supply support to the argument. The correctness of the essay, such as grammar and punctuation, was somewhat satisfactory. The writer did use some cant and jargon based wording in various underdeveloped sentences throughout the essay.
With all this said, I have to admit that I truly enjoyed reading the essay, most notably because I did recognize the effort put into it.
The writer sufficiently developed a topic with clear argument, so I must say that the content was considerably direct. The essay was organized with moderate sequence and it kept its point of view in "almost" every consecutive paragraph. In fact, call the organization of the essay an "almost" true attempt of flowing procession, but not quite perfect.
The style of the essay had a very serious tone and was partially to the point, based on the factual evidence, such as direct quotes given that supply support to the argument. The correctness of the essay, such as grammar and punctuation, was somewhat satisfactory. The writer did use some cant and jargon based wording in various underdeveloped sentences throughout the essay.
With all this said, I have to admit that I truly enjoyed reading the essay, most notably because I did recognize the effort put into it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)